JinotechandClaude Opus 5
911d534407
Twelve sections covering the single editable file, the two signed files that must never be touched, safe ways to open a UTF-8 CSV, every one of the 14 columns, the exact attestation string, a worked example, the five decision groups, the validation command, and what done looks like. Two prohibitions are stated explicitly: do not edit the signed reviewer files, and do not run build_human_review_packets.py, which overwrites them with blank templates. Also flags that adjudicators cannot use needs_source even though 52 rows carry it from reviewer 1. Every hardcoded string was verified against source: the attestation matches the validator byte for byte, the allowed final_decision set matches, all 14 columns are covered with no phantom or missing ones, and all six referenced paths exist. Corrects an earlier claim in the record. The review_date problem is not one problem. Reviewer 2 has 2026/9/20 on all 84 rows, a pure formatting issue. Reviewer 1 has 84 distinct dates incrementing daily to 2026/12/12 - an Excel drag-fill, mostly future-dated. That column cannot be fixed by reformatting, since the values themselves are wrong; only reviewer 1 can supply the real date. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>