JinotechandClaude Opus 5
ab175ce253
Fills reviewer_1_decision, reviewer_2_decision and conflict_reason for all 84 rows (252 cells) so adjudicators can work from one sheet. Every adjudicator field stays blank: identity, date, final_*, notes and attestation are human attestation and the script neither writes them nor overwrites existing values. conflict_reason follows the validator's actual rule (decisions differ, or reviewer_1 is not a plain approve) and states only the mechanical reason plus both decisions - no interpretation. 63 rows differ, 21 agree but are not plain approve, so all 84 require adjudication. Adds a purpose-built script rather than fixing at the usual build source: build_human_review_packets.py overwrites both signed reviewer CSVs with blank templates at lines 39-40, so running it would destroy 84 rows of signed human review. It was not run. The new script re-hashes both signed packets before and after and exits FATAL if either changed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>